Introduction
People in the western world are now experiencing one of the most serious health crisis in living memory, perhaps ever. Autism is estimated to touch the lives of over 500,000 families throughout the UK, with as many as 1.5 million Americans believed to have some form of autistic spectrum condition. These numbers can be expected to rise. Based on statistics from the United States Department of Education, autism is growing at a startling rate of 10–17 percent per year.
Without a medical breakthrough that brings understanding in the cause[s] of autism that hopefully will bring intervention, the graph will continue to chart the inevitable growth in autism cases. With the increased incidence the extra resources needed in both our medical/social services will not be available, the system will simply be overwhelmed. This is not conjecture but a mathematical certainty.
The information within the site presents the evidence for yeast infections as a result of the over use of antibiotics impacting on the quality of gut flora with the resultant complications as the cause of the current epidemic of the autistic condition.
Yeast infections have been known about for decades. the condition is endemic; Enormous amounts of knowledge on yeast infections are available. Whistle blowing doctors have successfully treated many thousands. those doctors conclude it's perhaps the main cause of chronic fatigue syndrome, [ME] Books written by those specialist doctors have become best sellers, Dr Crook’s book “The Yeast Connection” published back in the 1980's has sold well over one million and continues to sell.. Yet still the mainstream medical profession refuses to acknowledge yeast infections as a condition. You may wonder why
.
Doctors are very resistant to changing old concepts of diagnosis and treatment despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, because it is not what they were taught in medical school. Doctors also have little incentive to adopt new concepts. We live in a political litigious, blame and claim society, a doctor makes a mistake and it could cost his/her career so the average doctor is very wary of embarking on anything new, on what may be looked on as experimental treatment.
Many family doctors would treat but first-line doctors need the security of knowing hospitals will pick up the case if things get tricky. Everyone cautiously waits for the formal blessings of experts before proceeding. But those experts “consultants” steadfastly refuse to acknowledge yeast infections leaving the first line doctors little choice but to throw scorn on the concept of yeast infections. Very often giving the patient a diagnosis of physiological illness. Doctor’s peers viciously persecute any of their number who upsets the status quo. Even simple methods to improve medical quality are often met with fierce resistance.. A prime example is the fate of Dr Wakefield who was pilloried for just making the common sense suggestion that the triple MMR vaccine should be suspended in favour of single vaccinations while the awful situation surrounding autism is better understood. These types of actions give rise to an uneasy, but quite realistic, suspicion that this gap between what we know about diseases and what we do to prevent and treat them will become even wider.
The factors combine to place us medically speaking in the dark ages , it’s easy to see that your trusted doctor is in fact given these circumstances your worst enemy .
It’s the reason that many thousands are forced to research and self treat their illness. It’s just such a route that brings the author publishing this web site, it’s the result of seven years of research.
It’s a tragic situation for we now know that 22% of all cancers are caused by infection and that figure is steadily rising. [Professor Max Parkin National Cancer Research Institute conference. 2005] .
Today, of the 10 million cancers diagnosed each year throughout the world about a third of them are the result of chewing and smoking tobacco. A strong theme in all the UK cancer conferences during 2007 was the inescapable fact that with the increasing incidence of most cancers there must be an environmental; cause. Most believe carcinogens are the cause and that man has put the vast majority of carcinogens into the environment, and he can , if he wishes eliminate many of them
One flaw in that argument, many scientists believe, is that the human body has always had to deal with traces of environmental chemicals. From the smoke in primeval huts and tar that our ancestors painted their boats to the charred meat that they ate. Moreover, the natural world is full of chemicals that caused cancer, which are very similar to their man made counterparts. Fruit and vegetables such as bananas, basil, broccoli, lettuce, parsley and turnips contain natural pesticides in order to ward off predators, which when dabbed on the backs of mice also create cancer. A typical human diet contains natural carcinogens at one thousand times the quantities of the traces of artificial contaminants. So although there may be small, marginal risks from low levels of industrial chemicals in the environment, they pale into insignificance compared to other risks . However for people who work with pesticides- farmers, workers in the pharmaceutical industry they have an increased risk of developing cancer.
So , we have evolved to cope with natural toxins we encounter every day . What other possible causes are there. Well , gene mutation is a proven cause , for example ,Colon polyps generally occur when a few genes mutate, and they turn into cancer when a few more are damaged. The requirement for a series of genes to mutate is why cancer is predominantly a disease of old age. Gene mutation is not a convincing argument to explain cancers in the young
.Other diseases are now linked with infection including asthma, arthritis heart disease even Parkinson’s disease. Yeast undoubtedly impacts on health in a profound way and by denying its existence a whole new area of research is being overlooked.
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 